Wallace vs. Bell, (5th Cir. 1998)
Linked as:
Text
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR .
R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-41159 Conference Calendar CHARLES EARL WALLACE, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus M. BELL, Warden, Bradshaw State Jail; BEVERLY JACKSON, Grievance Coordinator, Bradshaw State Jail, Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 6:96-CV-908 December 9, 1998 Before DAVIS, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Charles Earl Wallace, Texas prisoner # 715750, appeals the district court§ 1983 action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Wallace§ 1983 action.
See Edwards v. Balisok , 520 U.S. 641 (1997).
This appeal is without arguable merit and thus frivolous.
It is DISMISSED. See Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983); 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2. Wallace is cautioned that future frivolous appeals will invite the imposition of sanctions. Wallace should review any pending appeals to ensure that they do not raise frivolous arguments.
APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
No. 97-41159
Sponsored links
This document cites
- U.S. Supreme Court - Edwards v. Balisok, 520 U.S. 641 (1997)
- U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit - Clinton C. Howard, Jr., and Michael Chapman and Kenneth Robinson, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. John T. King, Secretary, Department of Corrections, and Ross Maggio, Jr., Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, Defendants-Appellees., 707 F.2d 215 (5th Cir. 1983)
See other documents that cite the same legislation
