USA vs. Zepeda-Contreras, (5th Cir. 1999)

Text

---

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR .

R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-20292 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus RICARDO MANUEL ZEPEDA-CONTRERAS, also known as Ruben Rojas-Rios, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-98-CR-488-01 December 16, 1999 Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * Ricardo Manuel Zepeda-Contreras appeals from his conviction of illegal reentry after deportation. He contends solely that the district court erred by adjusting his offense level because he was deported following the commission of an aggravated felony.

He argues that his state-court conviction of possession of crack cocaine was not an aggravated felony for guideline sentencing purposes. Zepeda concedes that his argument is foreclosed by our caselaw, but raises his contention solely to preserve it for review by the Supreme Court. ZepedaÂ’s contention is foreclosed by our decision in United States v. Hinojosa-Lopez , 130 F.3d 691 (5th Cir. 1997). ZepedaÂ’s appeal is without arguable merit and is frivolous. Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983).

APPEAL DISMISSED. 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2. No. 99-20292

---