Text
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
June 25, 2003
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 02-10329
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JAMIE PERKINS,
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 3:00-CV-2042-M
USDC No. 3:97-CR-55-21-T
Before DeMOSS, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:* Jamie Perkins, a federal prisoner, appeals the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion, in which he challenged his drug and firearms convictions. He asserts that the rule set forth in Castillo v. United States,530 U.S. 120 (2000), renders his conviction for using and carrying a "short-barreled shotgun" invalid and requires resentencing on his other conviction for using and carrying a firearm during a drug offense, as he would no longer have two firearm convictions. Castillo is not retroactively applicable to cases on collateral review. See United States v. Gonzales, 327 F.3d 416, 418-22 (5th Cir. 2003).
Consequently, the judgment of the district court denying relief on Perkins's 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion is AFFIRMED.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Sponsored links
This document cites
- U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit - United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Enrique Gonzales, Sr., Defendant-Appellant., 327 F.3d 416 (5th Cir. 2003)
- US Code - Title 28: Judiciary and Judicial Procedure - 28 USC 2255 - Sec. 2255. Federal custody; remedies on motion attacking sentence
- U.S. Supreme Court - Castillo v. United States, 530 U.S. 120 (2000)
See other documents that cite the same legislation