USA vs. Martin, (5th Cir. 2001)
Linked as:
Text
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-40430 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus RAY MARTIN, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:99-CR-140-1 January 23, 2001 Before DAVIS, JONES and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Thomas J. Burbank, court-appointed counsel for Ray Martin, has filed a motion to withdraw and a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Martin has received a copy of counselÂ’s motion and brief, but has not filed a response. Our independent review of the brief and record discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counselÂ’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Sponsored links
