USA vs. Keller, (5th Cir. 1999)
Linked as:
Text
James Gordon Keller appeals the denial of his habeas corpus petition for failure to exhaust his admi nistrative remedies.
Keller argues that he is not required to exhaust his administrative remedies because doing so would be futile. Keller has not demonstrated the futility of administrative review. S ee Fuller v. Rich , 11 F.3d 61, 62 (5th Ci r. 1994). Accordingly, the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying KellerÂ’s petition for failure to exhaust his administrative remedies. S ee Fuller , 11 F.3d at 62; United States v. Dowling , 962 F.2d 390, 393 (5th Cir. 1992).
AFFIRMED.
1 Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS For the Fifth Circuit No. 98-30712 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, VERSUS JAMES GORDON KELLER, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana (97-CR-102-ALL-B-M2) March 25, 1999 Before DAVIS, DUHÉ, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:
Sponsored links
This document cites
- U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit - United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Don Dowling, Defendant-Appellant., 962 F.2d 390 (5th Cir. 1992)
- U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit - Joel Fuller, Petitioner-Appellant, v. James Rich, Warden for Fci, Seagoville, Texas, Et Al., Respondents-Appellees. No. 93-1767. Conference Calendar., 11 F.3d 61 (5th Cir. 1994)
See other documents that cite the same legislation
