Text
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
February 14, 2007
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 05-40937
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
CYPRIANO GONZALES-MARTINEZ,
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 2:04-CR-708-2
Before BARKSDALE, GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:* Counsel appointed to represent Cypriano Gonzales-Martinez (Gonzales) has moved for leave to withdraw from representation and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Gonzales has filed several responses. Our independent review of the record, counsel's brief, and Gonzales's responses shows that there are no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Although Gonzales argues in his responses that his counsel was ineffective for various reasons, the record is insufficiently developed to allow consideration of these claims on direct * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. appeal. See United States v. Higdon, 832 F.2d 312, 313-14 (5th Cir. 1987).
Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. All other outstanding motions are DENIED.
See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
Sponsored links
This document cites
- U.S. Supreme Court - Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)
- U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit - United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Tommy Ray Higdon, Defendant-Appellant. No. 86-1895. Summary Calendar., 832 F.2d 312 (5th Cir. 1987)
See other documents that cite the same legislation