USA vs. Broussard, (5th Cir. 1998)
Linked as:
Text
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-30898 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JOHN WESLEY BROUSSARD, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana (96-CR-60041-1) March 27, 1998 Before WIENER, BARKSDALE, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * John Wesley Broussard appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea to transportation of h azardous waste to an unpermitted facility, its transportation wit hout a manifest, and its storage without a permit. For the first time on appeal, he challenges the district court§ 2Q1.2, application notes 5 and 7. Based on our review of the record, we conclude that the district court did not commit plain error in so departing. S ee, e.g., United States v. Ravitch , 128 F.3d 865, 869 (5th Cir. 1997); United States v. Vital , 68 F.3d 114, 119 (5th Cir. 1995).
Accordingly, BroussardÂ’s sentence is AFFIRMED.
Sponsored links
This document cites
- U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit - United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Danielle Pauline Ravitch, Defendant-Appellant., 128 F.3d 865 (5th Cir. 1997)
- U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit - United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Junious Louis Vital, Defendant-Appellant., 68 F.3d 114 (5th Cir. 1995)
See other documents that cite the same legislation
