Text
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-40272 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JUSTINO ALANIZ-GARCIA, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-01-CR-480-1 March 7, 2003 Before JOLLY, JONES, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Justino Alaniz-Garcia pleaded guilty to an indictment charging him with illegal reentry following deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) & (b). Alaniz has appealed his sentence. Alaniz argues that the sentence-enhancing provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are unconstitutional in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000). Alaniz concedes that his argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224 (1998). See United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied ,
VACATE AND REMAND.
No. 02-40272
Sponsored links
This document cites
- U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit - United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Prisciliano Gracia-Cantu, Defendant-Appellant., 302 F.3d 308 (5th Cir. 2002)
- U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit - United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Khamis Khalil Dabeit, Defendant-Appellant,, 231 F.3d 979 (5th Cir. 2000)
- U.S. Code - Title 8: Aliens and Nationality - 8 USC 1326 - Sec. 1326. Reentry of removed aliens
- U.S. Supreme Court - Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224 (1998)
- U.S. Supreme Court - Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000)
See other documents that cite the same legislation