US v. Woodson, (4th Cir. 2001)
Linked as:
Text
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-7229 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus
CORWIN TYRELL WOODSON, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge.
(CR-94-79, CA-99-213-3)
Submitted: January 26, 2001 Decided: February 7, 2001
Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Corwin Tyrell Woodson, Appellant Pro Se. Mary Hannah Lauck, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM
Corwin Tyrell Woodson seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2000), and denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Woodson’s motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Woodson , Nos. CR-94-79; CA-99-213-3 (E.D.N.C. June 27 & Aug. 7, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED
Sponsored links
