US v. McKeithan, (4th Cir. 1996)

Text

---

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6411

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

ROBERT GARFIELD MCKEITHAN, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-

trict of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge.

(CR-91-106-R, CA-95-851)

Submitted: August 22, 1996 Decided: September 4, 1996

Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Garfield McKeithan, Appellant Pro Se. John Granville

Douglass, Robert William Jaspen, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES

ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. McKeithan , Nos. CR-91-106- R; CA-95-851 (E.D. Va. Mar. 4, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED

---