US v. Derwin Coles, (4th Cir. 2011)

Text

---

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6654

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DERWIN COLES, a/k/a Woods,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern

District of West Virginia, at Charleston. John T. Copenhaver,

Jr., District Judge. (2:01-cr-00254-3)

Submitted: April 15, 2011 Decided: August 5, 2011

Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Derwin Coles, Appellant Pro Se. John J. Frail, Assistant United

States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Derwin Coles appeals the district court's order granting in part and denying in part his motion filed pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Coles, No. 2:01-cr-00254-3 (S.D.W. Va. Mar. 19, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

---