US v. Deberry, (4th Cir. 2002)

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-6843 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus
EDDIE COLUMBUS DEBERRY, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. Voorhees,
District Judge. (CR-96-14-V, CA-00-74-5-1-V)
Submitted: July 25, 2002 Decided: August 2, 2002
Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Eddie Columbus Deberry, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Jack Higdon, Jr.,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM

Eddie Columbus Deberry seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2002). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Deberry , Nos. CR-96-14-V; CA-00-74-5-1-V (W.D.N.C. May 2, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED