US v. Dawson, (4th Cir. 2002)

Docket Number: 01-7521

Linked as:

Text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-7521 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

RANDOLPH E. DAWSON, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District

Judge. (CR-99-88)

Submitted: January 31, 2002 Decided: February 7, 2002

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Randolph E. Dawson, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM

Randolph E. Dawson appeals from the district court’s order denying his “Motion for Writ of Mandamus.” We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Dawson , No. CR-99-88 (E.D. Va. Aug. 17, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED