US v. Dawkins, (4th Cir. 2002)

Docket Number: 02-6888

Linked as:

Text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6888 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

JAMES EDWARD DAWKINS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. Voorhees,

District Judge. (CR-95-9)

Submitted: September 5, 2002 Decided: September 10, 2002

Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Edward Dawkins, Appellant Pro Se. Jack M. Knight, Jr.,

Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM

James Edward Dawkins seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motions correctly construed as requesting relief under 28 U.S.C. 2255 (2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Dawkins , No. CR-95-9 (W.D.N.C. May 24, 2002). Dawkins’ motion for the appointment of counsel is denied. We deny leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED