US v. Castrillon, (4th Cir. 1999)

Federal Circuits

Linked as:

Text


UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7234 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

MARIO CASTRILLON, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.

(CR-89-159-B, CA-97-81-R)

Submitted: March 30, 1999 Decided: April 16, 1999

Before HAMILTON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mario Castrillon, Appellant Pro Se. Julie C. Dudley, Assistant

United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM

Mario Castrillon seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Castrillon’s motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Castrillon , Nos. CR-89-159-B; CA-97-81-R (W.D. Va. June 26 and Sept. 9, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED

Sponsored links




ver las páginas en versión mobile | web

ver las páginas en versión mobile | web

© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.

Contents in vLex United States

Explore vLex

For Professionals

For Partners

Company