US v. Caira, (4th Cir. 1996)

Federal Circuits

Linked as:

Text


UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6325

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

ALBERTO CAIRA, a/k/a Rangeen Khan, a/k/a

Claude Bernard, a/k/a Jorge Miladeh, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Charleston. Solomon Blatt, Jr., District Judge.

(CR-86-5, CR-86-162, CA-94-3014-2-8)

Submitted: July 23, 1996 Decided: July 31, 1996

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alberto Caira, Appellant Pro Se. Marvin Jennings Caughman, As-

sistant United States Attorney, C olumbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his motion for relief under 28 U.S.C. 2255 (1988), as amended by Act of Apr. 24, 1996, 28 U.S.C.S. § 2255 (Law. Co-op. Advance Sheet June 1996). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Caira , Nos. CR-86-5; CR-86-162; CA-94-3014-2-8 (D.S.C. Jan. 8, 1996). We deny Appellant's motion to expedite the appeal in light of this disposition.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED

Sponsored links




ver las páginas en versión mobile | web

ver las páginas en versión mobile | web

© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.

Contents in vLex United States

Explore vLex

For Professionals

For Partners

Company