US v. Burke, (4th Cir. 1997)

Text

---

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6814 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

WILLIE LEE BURKE, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Frank A. Kaufman, Senior District Judge.

(CR-91-119, CA-97-498-K)

Submitted: November 20, 1997 Decided: December 10, 1997

Before MURNAGHAN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Willie Lee Burke, Appellant Pro Se. Jan Paul Miller, OFFICE OF THE

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM

Appellant seeks to appeal from the district court's orders dismissing for failure to obtain autho rization pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 2244 (West Supp. 1997), his second motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997), and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no abuse of discretion and no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Burke , Nos. CR-91-119; CA-97-498-K (D. Md. Apr. 29, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED

---