US v. Bramwell, (4th Cir. 1999)
Linked as:
Text
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-6999 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus
CAROL BRAMWELL, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (CR-91-429)
Submitted: October 21, 1999 Decided: October 27, 1999
Before WIDENER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Carol Bramwell, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Philip Rosenberg, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM
Carol Bramwell appeals the district court’s order denying her motion filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3553(b) (1994) and 18 U.S.C.A. § 3582 (West 1985 & Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Bramwell , No. CR-91-429 (E.D. Va. June 2, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
Sponsored links
