US v. Blalock, (4th Cir. 1999)

Text

---

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6608 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

PRESTON EUGENE BLALOCK, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Spartanburg. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District

Judge. (CR-90-394, CA-99-905)

Submitted: August 19, 1999 Decided: August 26, 1999

Before WIDENER and KING, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Cir-

cuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Preston Eugene Blalock, Appellant Pro Se. David Calhoun Stephens,

Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM

Preston Eugene Blalock seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 9). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Blalock , Nos. CR-90-394; CA-99-905 (D.S.C. Apr. 19, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED

---