US v. Barnwell, (4th Cir. 1996)

Text

---

Filed: October 18, 1996 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7159 (CR-92-142, CA-96-217-R)

United States of America, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

Ronson O'Shea Barnwell, Defendant - Appellant.

ORDER

The Court amends its opinion filed October 15, 1996, as follows: On the cover sheet, section 4 -- the decision line is completed to show the decided date -- "Decided: October 15, 1996

." For the Court - By Direction

/s/ Patricia S. Connor

Clerk

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7159

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

RONSON O'SHEA BARNWELL, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-

trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Chief District

Judge. (CR-92-142, CA-96-217-R)

Submitted: October 3, 1996 Decided: October 15, 1996

Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ronson O'Shea Barnwell, Appellant Pro Se. Ruth Elizabeth Plagenhoef, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia,

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying Appellant's motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. See Bailey v. United States , U.S., 64 U.S.L.W. 4039 (U.S. Dec. 6, 1995) (No. 94-7448); United States Sentencing Commission, Guidelines Manual , § 2D1.1(b)(1). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED

---