US v. Alonso, (4th Cir. 2004)

Text

---

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-6300 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

PEDRO ALONSO, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior

District Judge. (CR-00-136-1-7-F)

Submitted: June 10, 2004 Decided: July 14, 2004

Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Pedro Alonso, Appellant Pro Se. J. Frank Bradsher, OFFICE OF THE

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

- 2 - PER CURIAM: Pedro Alonso appeals the district courtÂ’s order denying his Motion to Modify Condition of Fine Imposed. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court. See

United States v. Alonso

, No. CR-00-136-1-7-F (E.D.N.C. Jan. 7, 2004). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED

---