Thompson v. Novapro Risk Solutions, LP, (4th Cir. 2010)

Status: Not Published

Docket Number: 09-2402

Linked as:

Text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-2402

WOODROW B. THOMPSON, III,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

NOVAPRO RISK SOLUTIONS, LP; CYNTHIA D. SADLER, Individually

and as Employee and Agent for: NOVA PRO RISK SOLUTIONS, LP;

DIANE SMITH, Individually and as Employee and Agent for:

NOVA PRO RISK SOLUTIONS, LP,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District

Judge. (1:09-cv-01755-WDQ)

Submitted: October 14, 2010 Decided: October 20, 2010

Before MOTZ, KING, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mercedes C. Samborsky, Joppa, Maryland, for Appellant. Alan S.

Block, A. David Freeman, BONNER KIERNAN TREBACH & CROCIATA, LLP,

Washington, D.C.; David A. Rosenberg, FORD & HARRISON, LLP,

Washington, D.C., for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Woodrow B. Thompson, III, appeals the district court's order denying his motion to remand all federal and state employment discrimination claims to state court. We review de novo the district court's denial of the motion to remand. See Moffitt v. Residential Funding, Co., LLC, 604 F.3d 156, 159 (4th Cir. 2010). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Thompson v. Novapro Risk Solutions, LP, No.

1:09-cv-01755-WDQ (D. Md. Dec. 10, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED