Thomas v. Allgood, (4th Cir. 2011)

Federal Circuits

Linked as:

Text


UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6105

TITUS THOMAS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

OFFICER ALLGOOD; OFFICER VINE; GEORGE GREGORY, Hearing

Officer; CCMS WILLIS; OFFICER HAWKINS; OFFICER ROBE; OFFICER

JEROME; SGT. SMITH; SGT. OLIVER; OFFICER K. BROWN; SGT. D.

ANDERSON,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District

Judge. (8:10-cv-03134-AW)

Submitted: May 26, 2011 Decided: June 1, 2011

Before KING, SHEDD, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Titus Thomas, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Titus Thomas appeals the district court's order dismissing without prejudice his 42U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) civil rights complaint for failing to comply with the court's earlier order requiring him to particularize and amend his complaint.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Thomas v. Allgood, No. 8:10-cv-03134-AW (D. Md.

Dec. 23, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Sponsored links




ver las páginas en versión mobile | web

ver las páginas en versión mobile | web

© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.

Contents in vLex United States

Explore vLex

For Professionals

For Partners

Company