Tenaud v. Dodrill, (4th Cir. 2002)

Docket Number: 02-6534

Linked as:

Text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6534 HUGO TENAUD, Petitioner - Appellant, versus

D. SCOTT DODRILL, Warden, LSCI Butner,

Butner, NC, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief

District Judge. (CA-02-49-BO)

Submitted: October 18, 2002 Decided: October 31, 2002

Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Hugo Tenaud, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM

Hugo Tenaud appeals the district court§ 2241 (2000) petition, construing the petition as a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion, and dismissing it as successive.

We have reviewed the record and the district courtÂ’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Tenaud v. Dodrill , No. CA-02-49-BO (E.D.N.C. Jan. 29, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal c ontentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED