State of ND v. Michael H. Nowik, (8th Cir. 2003)
Linked as:
Text
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-2705
State of North Dakota, Appellee, v. Michael H. Nowik, Appellant.
Submitted: November 21, 2003
Filed: November 25, 2003
Before WOLLMAN, FAGG, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Michael H. Nowik appeals the district court's for reconsideration under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) and for default judgment, both filed after the district court dismissed his purported removal of a state court criminal action. We conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying either the Rule 60(b) motion, see Swope v. Siegel-Robert, Inc., 243 F.3d 486, 498 (8th Cir.) (Rule 60(b) motion must demonstrate exceptional circumstances for
the District of North Dakota.
relief; reviewed for abuse of discretion), cert. denied,
Appeal from the United States
District Court for the District
of North Dakota.
[UNPUBLISHED]
order denying Nowik's motions
The Honorable Daniel Hovland, Chief Judge, United States District Court for
Sponsored links
This document cites
- U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit - Thomas A. Swope, Judy N. Swope, Estate of O.W. Schneider, Jr., By and Through Personal Representatives for the Estate of O.W. Schneider, Jr., Tracy Leigh Schneider Morris; O.W. Schneider, Iii; Kris Douglas Schneider; Melody Dawn Schneider; Mark William Schneider; Tracy Leigh Schneider Morris; O.W. Schneider, Iii, Appellees/Cross-Appellants, v. Siegel-Robert, Inc., a Nevada Corporation, Appellant/Cross-Appellee.
See other documents that cite the same legislation
