Staley v. South Carolina Dept of Corrections, (4th Cir. 2004)
Linked as:
Text
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-6022 DANIEL STALEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS;
KIRKLAND CORRECTIONAL IN STITUTION; UNIDENTIFIED PARTIES, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Beaufort. Patrick Michael Duffy, District
Judge. (CA-03-3436)
Submitted: May 12, 2004 Decided: May 21, 2004
Before WILKINSON and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Daniel Staley, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
* We note that Staley§ 636(b)(1) (2000).
Houston v. Lack
, 487 U.S. 266 (1988). We have considered the objections in reaching our decision. - 2 - PER CURIAM: Daniel Staley appeals the district courtÂ’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. * See
Staley v. South
Carolina DepÂ’t of Corrections
, No. CA-03-3436 (D.S.C. Dec. 4, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
Sponsored links
