Spitzer v. Trans Union, (4th Cir. 2001)
Linked as:
Text
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-2079 STANLEY SPITZER; ROSE SPITZER, Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus
TRANS UNION, LLC, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Elizabeth City. Terrence W. Boyle,
Chief District Judge. (CA-99-24)
Submitted: December 29, 2000 Decided: February 7, 2001
Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Stanley Spitzer, Rose Spitzer, Appellants Pro Se. Keith Alan
Williams, Greenville, North Carolina; Bruce S. Luckman, SATZBERG,
TRICHON, KOGAN & WERTHEIMER, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM
Stanley and Rose Spitzer appeal the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendant in this action alleging violations of the Fair Credit Report Act. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Spitzer v. Trans Union, LLC , No. CA-99-24 (E.D.N.C. Aug. 2, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
Sponsored links
