Smith v. Bridgestone North America Tire, (4th Cir. 2011)

Federal Circuits

Linked as:

Text


UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-2208

ADRIAN MARION SMITH,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

BRIDGESTONE NORTH AMERICA TIRE OPERATIONS LLC; FORD MOTOR

COMPANY; RICHARDSON PATRIC WESTBROOK & BRICKMAN LLC LAW

FIRM; TERRY E. RICHARDSON, JR., Attorney; DONNIE HOWARD;

EDWARD J. WESTBROOK, Attorney; MICHAEL J. BRICKMAN,

Attorney; CHARLES W. PATRIC, JR., Attorney,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Aiken. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge.

(1:10-cv-01757-MBS)

Submitted: March 31, 2011 Decided: April 4, 2011

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Adrian Marion Smith, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Adrian Marion Smith appeals from the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his civil action without prejudice and for lack of jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Smith v. Bridgestone North America Tire Operations, LLC, No. 1:10-cv-01757-MBS (D.S.C. Oct. 14, 2010).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Sponsored links




ver las páginas en versión mobile | web

ver las páginas en versión mobile | web

© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.

Contents in vLex United States

Explore vLex

For Professionals

For Partners

Company