Sirleaf v. Boozer, (4th Cir. 2002)

Text

---

* Senior Judge Hamilton did not participate in consideration of this case. The opinion is filed by a quorum of the panel

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(d). UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-2109 MOMOLU V.S. SIRLEAF; ELOUISE A. SIRLEAF, Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus

F. VERNON BOOZER; EDWARD C. COVAHEY, JR.;

THOMAS P. DORE; ROGER J. SULLIVAN, Attorneys,

Substituted Trustees and agents, Covahey &

Boozer; DONNA HILD, Legal Assistant and Agent,

Covahey & Boozer; COVAHEY & BOOZER; FIRST

TRUST NATIONAL ASSOCIATION; CITICORP MORTGAGE,

INCORPORATED; CITIMORTGAGE, INCORPORATED,

Member of Citigroup; CITIBANK & CITIGROUP,

INCORPORATED; MAINUDDIN JANGI; NORWEST

MORTGAGE, INCORPORATED, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-01-

3-L)

Submitted: December 19, 2002 Decided: December 30, 2002

Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, * Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Momolu V.S. Sirleaf, Elouise A. Sirleaf, Appellants Pro Se. Douglas Windsor Biser, MUDD, HARRISON & BURCH, Towson, Maryland;

Robert Scott Brennen, MILES & STOCKBRIDGE, Baltimore, Maryland, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM

Momolu V.S. and Elouise A. Sirleaf seek to appeal the district court§ 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 12 92 (2000); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order the Sirleafs seek to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order, as the district court has yet to enter a final order in their case. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED

---