Sheppard vs. Shaffer, (5th Cir. 1997)
Linked as:
Text
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR .
R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-10626 Summary Calendar AARON ANTHONY SHEPPARD, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus HERMAN SHAFFER, Doctor; VEACH, Officer; BRUCE A. LARSEN, Captain; MOON, Counsel Substitute II; WRIGHT, Counsel Substitute II; MORRISSON, Senior Counsel Substitute; QUINTANILLA, Captain, Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 1:97-CV-61 November 25, 1997 Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Aaron Anthony Sheppard, Texas state prisoner # 658333, appeals the district court§ 1983 complaint as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i).
We review the district courtÂ’s dismissal for abuse of discretion.
Siglar v. Hightower ,
Sheppard complains of procedural defects in disclipinary hearings against him. Sheppard has not met the required preconditions to bring a section 1983 claim on these grounds.
Edwards v. Balisok , 117 S. Ct. 1584, 1589 (1997); Heck v. Humphrey , 512 U.S. 477, 486-87 (1994); Clarke v. Stadler , 121 F.3d 222, 226 (5th Cir. 1997). Since it did not abuse its discretion in dismissing SheppardÂ’s complaint, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
No. 97-10626
Sponsored links
This document cites
- U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit - Charles W. Clarke, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross Appellant, v. Richard L. Stalder, Et Al., Defendants, Richard L. Stalder, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee, Robert Tanner, Defendant-Appellee, Captain Charles Moulard, Defendant-Appellee.
- US Code - Title 28: Judiciary and Judicial Procedure - 28 USC 1915 - Sec. 1915. Proceedings in forma pauperis
- U.S. Supreme Court - Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994)
See other documents that cite the same legislation
