Shaw v. Davis, (4th Cir. 1998)
Linked as:
Text
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-6272 HAROLD SHAW, Petitioner - Appellant, versus
WILLIAM R. DAVIS, Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District
Judge. (CA-97-1723-2-20-AJ)
Submitted: July 2, 1998 Decided: July 27, 1998
Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Harold Shaw, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy
Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM
Harold Shaw seeks to appeal the district court§ 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district courtÂ’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Shaw v. Davis , No. CA-97-1723-2-20-AJ (D.S.C. Feb. 6, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED
Sponsored links
