Scott v. Wells Fargo and Co, (4th Cir. 2003)

Docket Number: 03-1327

Linked as:

Text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-1327 MICHAEL A. SCOTT; TERRY SCOTT, Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus

WELLS FARGO & COMPANY; WELLS FARGO HOME

MORTGAGE, INCORPORATED; GENERAL ELECTRIC

COMPANY; GE CAPITAL MORTGAGE SERVICES,

INCORPORATED, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States Dist rict Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District

Judge. (CA-02-789-2)

Submitted: May 8, 2003 Decided: June 27, 2003

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael A. Scott, Terry Scott, Appellants Pro Se. Stanley Graves

Barr, Jr., KAUFMAN & CANOLES, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM

Michael and Terry Scott appeal the district court’s judgment granting partial summary judgment to the Appellees and dismissing their complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm in part for the reasons stated by the district court. See Scott v. Wells Fargo & Co. , No. 02-789-2 (E.D. Va., filed Jan. 14, 2003, entered Jan. 15, 2003). Although the Scotts may have been entitled to amend the complaint as of right, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a), we have reviewed the additional claims raised in the proposed amended complaint and find the amendment futile. We also deny the Scotts’ motions for summary reversal and an injunction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED