Saysay v. Robe, (4th Cir. 1997)

Text

---

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7761

AMOS SAYSAY, a/k/a Amos Sayson, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

JAMES ROBE, Chief of Police, Howard County;

MARY LEVY, employee of Howard County Police

Department, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA-

-1996-DKC)

Submitted: January 28, 1997 Decided: February 13, 1997

Before HALL, ERVIN, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed in part and dismissed in part by unpublished per curiam

opinion.

Amos Saysay, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara McFaul Cook, County Solici-

tor, Frank Todd Taylor, COUNTY SOLICITOR'S OFFICE, Ellicott City,

Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994). To the extent Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his equal protection claims without prejudice, we dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392 , 10 F.3d 1064 (4th Cir. 1993). As for Appellant's other claims, we have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the remainder of the order on the reasoning of the district court. Saysay v. Robe , No. CA-96-1996-DKC (D. Md. Oct. 9, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED IN PART; DISMISSED IN PART

---