Sanchez-Rodriguez v. SHHS, (1st Cir. 1995)

Federal Circuits

Linked as:

Text




October 30, 1995

[NOT FOR PUBLICATION]

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT

No. 95-1537

FELIX SANCHEZ-RODRIGUEZ,

Plaintiff, Appellant,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,

Defendant, Appellee.

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

[Hon. Jaime Pieras, Jr., U.S. District Judge]

Before

Cyr, Boudin and Lynch, Circuit Judges.

Juan A. Hernandez Rivera and Raymond Rivera Esteves on brief for appellant.

Guillermo Gil, United States Attorney, Maria Hortensia Rios- Gandara, Assistant United States Attorney, and Nancy B. Salafia, Assistant Regional Counsel, Social Security Administration, on brief for appellee.

Per Curiam. We affirm for substantially the reasons stated by the district court.

We reject claimant's argument that the ALJ improperly substituted his own lay opinion for that of the non-examining physicians. Unlike the non-examining doctors, the ALJ heard claimant's testimony concerning the type of work he had been able to perform with his brothers. That testimony, along with claimant's failure to document his claim of frequent emergency room visits, supports the ALJ's conclusion that claimant was able adequately to perform unskilled work.

The ALJ did not err in relying upon the grid to conclude that sufficient unskilled jobs not requiring frequent contact with the public existed in the national economy, which claimant could perform. Ortiz v. Secretary, 890 F.2d 520, 525-28 (1st Cir. 1989); Zalewski v. Heckler, 760 F.2d 160, 165 (7th Cir. 1985).

Affirmed.

Sponsored links




ver las páginas en versión mobile | web

ver las páginas en versión mobile | web

© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.

Contents in vLex United States

Explore vLex

For Professionals

For Partners

Company