Roger Hargrave v. P. G. County Circuit Court, (4th Cir. 2011)

Status: Not Published

Linked as:

Text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6401

ROGER HARGRAVE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

P. G. COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT; STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE; COUNTY

ATTORNEY'S OFFICE,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson Everett Legg, District Judge.

(1:11-cv-00223-BEL)

Submitted: July 28, 2011 Decided: August 2, 2011

Before SHEDD, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Roger Hargrave, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Roger Hargrave appeals the district court's order construing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) action as a mandamus petition and denying relief and the court's order denying his subsequent motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Hargrave v. Prince George's Cnty. Circuit Court, No. 1:11-cv-00223-BEL (D. Md. Feb.

7, 2011 & Feb. 24, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED