Robinson v. Apfel, Commissioner, (4th Cir. 2000)
Linked as:
Text
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-2197 VENSON J. ROBINSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus
KENNETH S. APFEL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL
SECURITY, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Orangeburg. David C. Norton, District Judge.
(CA-97-1154-5-18JI)
Submitted: February 15, 2000 Decided: March 7, 2000
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
W. Daniel Mayes, Aiken, South Carolina, for Appellant. Frank W. Hunger, Assistant Attorney General, J. Rene Josey, United States
Attorney, John Berkley Grimball, Assistant United States Attorney,
Deana R. Ertl-Lombardi, Chief Counsel, Michele M. Kelley, Assistant
Regional Counsel, Office of the General Counsel, SOCIAL SECURITY
ADMINISTRATION, Denver, Colorado, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM
Venson J. Robinson appeals the district court’s order upholding the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security finding that Robinson is not disabled and not entitled to disability insurance benefits or supplemental security income. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Robinson v. Apfel , No. CA-97-1154-5-18JI (D.S.C. June 21, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
Sponsored links
