Richardson v. State of MD, (4th Cir. 2000)
Linked as:
Text
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-1165 WILLIAM LEE RICHARDSON, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus
THE STATE OF MARYLAND; FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF
MARYLAND, a/k/a All First, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA-
-129-S)
Submitted: March 23, 2000 Decided: March 30, 2000
Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William Lee Richardson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM
William Lee Richardson, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil rights action as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e) (West Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Richardson v. Maryland , No. CA-00-129-S (D. Md. Jan. 19, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
Sponsored links
