Richards v. Rumsfeld, (4th Cir. 2004)

Text

---

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-1395 CAROLYN M. RICHARDS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DONALD RUMSFELD, Secretary; UNITED STATES

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, Defendants - Appellees, and U. S. DEFENSE COMMISSARY AGENCY, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief

District Judge. (CA-02-1114-A)

Submitted: October 31, 2003 Decided: January 14, 2004

Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Crystal A. G. Fisher, NATHANIEL D. JOHNSON & ASSOCIATES, L.L.C.,

Waldorf, Maryland, for Appellant. Paul J. McNulty, United States

Attorney, Leslie B. McClendon, Assistant United States Attorney,

Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

- 2 - PER CURIAM: Carolyn M. Richards appeals from the district courtÂ’s order entering summary judgment in favor of the Defendant on her

employment discrimination action alleging a hostile work

environment and retaliation. We have reviewed the record,

including the partiesÂ’ briefs, and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. See

Richards v. Rumsfeld

, No. CA-02-1114-A (E.D. Va. filed Feb. 25, 2003; entered Feb. 26, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED

---