Reliford v. Dale County, (4th Cir. 1999)

Text

---

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-1314 EPHRAIN RELIFORD, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

DALE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES;

CHRISSIE N. BOYD; DALE COUNTY, Alabama, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-98-3625-3-17BC)

Submitted: May 13, 1999 Decided: May 18, 1999

Before WIDENER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Cir-

cuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ephrain Reliford, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

* The motion for reconsideration from which Reliford appeals was filed on February 25 and entered on the district court’s docket

on February 26, 1999, and the order appealed from was filed on

February 3 and entered on the district court’s docket on February

, 1999, in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 58 and 79(a). See

Wilson v. Murray

, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986). 2 PER CURIAM:

Ephrain Reliford, Jr., a South Carolina inmate, appeals the

district court’s orders dismissing his civil action under 28

U.S.C.A. § 1915A(b)(1) (West Supp. 1998) and denying his motion to

reconsider. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find

that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal

on the reasoning of the district court. See

Reliford v. Dale

County Dep’t of Human Resources

, No. CA-98-3625-3-17BC (D.S.C. Feb. 4 & 26, 1999). * We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED

---