Text
J. Richard Thesing (argued); Littler, Mendelson & Fastiff, San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner in 26892.
Robert M. Lieber (argued), Litter, Mendelson & Fastiff, San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner in 71-1853.
Joseph E. Mayer, Atty., NLRB (argued), Washington, D.C., for respondent in 26892 and 71-1853.
Bernard Dunau (argued), Washington, D.C., for intervenor in 26892 and 71-1853.
Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board.
Before CHAMBERS and BROWNING, Circuit Judges, and SHARP,[fn*] District Judge.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:
The Supreme Court vacated the judgments in those case and remanded them for reconsideration insight of N.L.R.B. v. Boeing Company, 412 U.S. 67, 93 S.Ct. 1952, 36 L.Ed.2d 752 (1973). Machinists and Aerospace Workers Local 504 v. O'Reilly, 414 U.S. 807, 94 S.Ct. 36, 38 L.Ed.2d 43 (1973).
In No. 71-1853, we continue to adhere to those portions of our opinion, reported at 472 F.2d 416 (9th Cir. 1972), holding that the Bard properly defined the issues before it and that the "no-strike" provision of the collective bargaining agreement had no applications to the honoring of a sister union's lawful picket line.
As for the other issues in the case, the Supreme Court has settled that it is not within the purview of the Board's responsibility to review the reasonableness of disciplinary fines imposed by unions upon their members. N.L.R.B. v. Boeing Company, supra.
Accordingly, the petition to review the order of the National labor Relations Board is denied.
In No. 26,892, the single issue presented is that which is now concluded by Boeing. Therefore, the petition to review the order of the Nation Labor Relations Board is denied.
[fn*] The Honorable Morell E. Sharp, United States District Judge for the Western District of Washington, sitting by designation.
Sponsored links