Reeves v. VA Dept Corr Ed, (4th Cir. 2003)
Linked as:
Text
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-1177 LORETTA JANE REEVES, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus
VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONAL EDUCATION;
MARK HUTCHINSON; GEORGE ERPS, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Big Stone Gap. James P. Jones, District
Judge. (CA-02-20-2)
Submitted: May 15, 2003 Decided: May 20, 2003
Before LUTTIG and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Loretta Jane Reeves, Appellant Pro Se. Sydney E. Rab, Anthony
Philip Meredith, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA,
Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM
Loretta Jane Reeves appeals the district court’s judgment granting the Appellees’ motion for summary judgment and dismissing her hostile work environment claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Reeves v. Virginia Dep’t of Corr.
Educ. , No. CA-02-20-2 (W.D. Va. Jan. 9, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
Sponsored links
