Reddick v. Martin, (4th Cir. 1998)
Linked as:
Text
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-7280 MARCUS REDDICK, Petitioner - Appellant, versus
TOM C. MARTIN, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, District Judge.
(CA-97-497-5-F)
Submitted: July 22, 1998 Decided: July 31, 1998
Before ERVIN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Marcus Reddick, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM
Appellant appeals the district court§ 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 8). We have reviewed the record and the district courtÂ’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Reddick v. Martin , No. CA-97-497-5-F (E.D.N.C. July 28, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED
Sponsored links
