PULIDO V. LAMARQUE, (9th Cir. 2009)

Text

---

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MICHAEL ROBERT PULIDO, 

Petitioner-Appellee, No. 05-15916

v.  D.C. No.

CHRIS CHRONES, CV-99-04933-CW

Respondent-Appellant.



MICHAEL ROBERT PULIDO,  No. 05-16308

Petitioner-Appellant,

v.  D.C. No.

CV-99-04933-CW

CHRIS CHRONES,

ORDER

Respondent-Appellee.



Filed June 9, 2009

Before: Alfred T. Goodwin, Diarmuid F. O'Scannlain, and

Sidney R. Thomas, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

Petitioner-Appellant's Petition for Reconsideration of Dis-

positive Order, filed with this court on March 31, 2009 is

GRANTED. The Order remanding the case, filed March 20,

2009 is VACATED.

Petitioner-Appellant's Motion to file Supplemental Brief

Following Supreme Court Remand, filed March 10, 2009 is

GRANTED and Petitioner-Appellant's Supplemental Brief is

ordered FILED.

6829

Respondent-Appellant is directed to file a responsive brief to Petitioner-Appellee's Supplemental Brief to address the application of the harmless error standard of Brecht v.

Abrahamson, 507 U.S. 619 (1993). Respondent-Appellant shall respond within fourteen (14) days of the date of this order, and Respondent-Appellant shall provide this court with ten (10) copies.

ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE--U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON REUTERS/WEST--SAN FRANCISCO The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2009 Thomson Reuters/West.

---