Price v. Angelone, (4th Cir. 2004)

Federal Circuits

Linked as:

Text


UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-7735 GUY JACKSON PRICE, Petitioner - Appellant, versus

RONALD J. ANGELONE, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior

District Judge. (CA-02-883-7)

Submitted: February 25, 2004 Decided: March 29, 2004

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David Bernard Hargett, HARGETT & WATSON, P.L.C., Richmond,

Virginia, for Appellant. Robert H. Anderson, III, OFFICE OF THE

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

- 2 - PER CURIAM: Guy Jackson Price seeks to appeal the district court§ 2254

  (2000) alleging ineffective assistance of counsel and a deficient

final judgment order. An appeal may not be taken from the final

order in a § 2254 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)

  (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.§ 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his

constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or

wrong. See

Miller-El v. Cockrell

, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel

, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee

, 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the

record and conclude that Price has not made the requisite showing.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED

Sponsored links




ver las páginas en versión mobile | web

ver las páginas en versión mobile | web

© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.

Contents in vLex United States

Explore vLex

For Professionals

For Partners

Company