Notice: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(C) States that Unpublished Orders, Judgments, and Explanatory Memoranda May Not Be Cited as Precedents, But Counsel May Refer To Unpublished Dispositions When the Binding or Preclusive Effect of the Disposition, Rather Than Its Quality as Precedent, is Relevant. Edmund A. Fairhead, Appellant, v. Deleuw, Cather & Company., 1 F.3d 45 (D.C. Cir. 1993)

Docket Number: 91-7079,93-7055

Reporting Judge: 303 U.S.App.D.C. 86

Linked as:

Text

Before MIKVA, Chief Judge, and WALD and BUCKLEY, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs and supplemental memoranda filed by the parties. The court has determined that the issues presented occasion no need for an opinion. See D.C.Cir.Rule 14(c). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court's grant of summary judgment be affirmed substantially for the reasons stated by the district court in its Statement of Reasons on Remand, filed March 25, 1993.

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C.Cir.Rule 15.