Pinckney v. Moore, (4th Cir. 1998)

Text

---

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6590 LEROY A. PINCKNEY, Petitioner - Appellant, versus

MICHAEL MOORE; CHARLES M. CONDON, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Rock Hill. David C. Norton, District Judge.

(CA-97-1177-10-18BD)

Submitted: July 22, 1998 Decided: August 10, 1998

Before ERVIN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

LeRoy A. Pinckney, Appellant Pro Se. William Edgar Salter, III,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Columbia, South

Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM

LeRoy A. Pinckney seeks to appeal the district court§ 2254 (West 4 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district courtÂ’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Pinckney v. Moore , No. CA-97-1177-10-18BD (D.S.C. Mar. 16, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED

---