Pierce v. Bergamine, (4th Cir. 2011)

Status: Not Published

Linked as:

Text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6225

LARRY ONEAL PIERCE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

TOM BERGAMINE; W.C. DEW; RITA COX,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:10-ct-03060-D) Submitted: April 28, 2011 Decided: May 4, 2011 Before DAVIS, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Larry Oneal Pierce, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Larry Oneal Pierce appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28U.S.C.

§ 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we affirm the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Pierce v.

Bergamine, No. 5:10-ct-03060-D (E.D.N.C. Jan. 24, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED