Text
Before KEITH, MILBURN and ALAN E. NORRIS, Circuit Judges.
Plaintiffs move the court for permission to proceed in forma pauperis and for counsel in their appeal from a summary judgment dismissing their action filed under Sec. 301, 29 U.S.C. Sec . 185, and Title VII. Upon examination of the record and briefs, we unanimously agree that oral argument is not needed, Fed. R. App. P. 34(a), and, accordingly, affirm.
Summary judgment was proper because there was no genuine issue of material fact and the defendants were clearly entitled to judgment as a matter of law. See Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, 106 S.Ct. 2505 (1986); Kochins v. Linden-Alimak, Inc., 799 F.2d 1128 (6th Cir. 1986). The hybrid Sec. 301 claims where also time-barred. See DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, 462 U.S. 151 (1983); Smith v. General Motors Corp., 747 F.2d 372 (6th Cir. 1984).
Accordingly, the plaintiffs' motions are hereby denied and the district court's judgment is affirmed. Rule 9(b)(5), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.
Sponsored links
This document cites
- U.S. Supreme Court - DelCostello v. Teamsters, 462 U.S. 151 (1983)
- U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit - George J. Kochins, Curator of the Estate of John G. Kochins, Plaintiff- Appellant, v. Linden-Alimak, Inc.; Heede International, Inc.; Linden-Alimak, A.B. of Skellestea, Sweden; Roy Howard; Bobby Franklin Bevels; Jerry W. Pitcock; Art Armstrong; and Mine Safety Appliances Company, Defendants-Appellees.
- U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit - Judy A. Smith, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. General Motors Corporation, Defendant-Appellee. David Fulkerson, Edward Latham, Jr., Johnny Perry, Plaintiffs-Appellants, Robert Wolfe, Intervening Plaintiff-Appellant, v. International Harvester; International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America; Local 817 of the International Union, United Automobile Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, Uaw, Defendants-Appellees. Dennis J. Mcconnell, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Rainbo Baking Company; International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America, Local 114, Defendants-Appellees., 747 F.2d 372 (6th Cir. 1984)
See other documents that cite the same legislation