Nichols-Smith v. Branch Banking and Trust, (4th Cir. 2005)

Federal Circuits

Linked as:

Text


UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-2224

MARY ANN NICHOLS-SMITH,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

BRANCH BANKING & TRUST COMPANY; JENNIFER

ALEXANDER,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Lacy H. Thornburg,

District Judge. (CA-03-368-3)

Submitted: December 10, 2004 Decided: January 25, 2005

Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mary Ann Nichols-Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Virginia A. Piekarski,

CONSTANGY, BROOKS & SMITH, L.L.C., Winston-Salem, North Carolina,

Edward Katze, Timothy R. Newton, CONSTANGY, BROOKS & SMITH,

Atlanta, Georgia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Mary Ann Nichols-Smith appeals the district court's order denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Nichols-Smith v. Branch Banking & Trust Co., No. CA-03-368-3 (W.D.N.C. Aug. 27, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Sponsored links




ver las páginas en versión mobile | web

ver las páginas en versión mobile | web

© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.

Contents in vLex United States

Explore vLex

For Professionals

For Partners

Company