Nester v. Analostan Home Assoc, (4th Cir. 2003)

Docket Number: 02-2082

Linked as:

Text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-2082 ROBERT NESTER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

ANALOSTAN HOMES ASSOCIATION, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee.

No. 02-2323 ROBERT NESTER, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

ANALOSTAN HOMES ASSOCIATION, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellant. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief

District Judge. (CA-02-88-A)

Submitted: May 8, 2003 Decided: June 9, 2003

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Barry Weintraub, Stafford, Virginia, for Appellant. Michael L. OÂ’Reilly, THE OÂ’REILLY LAW FIRM, Herndon, Virginia; Raymond J. Diaz, REES, BROOME & DIAZ, P.C., Vienna, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM

Robert Nester appeals the district court§§ 3601-3619 (2000). Analostan crossappeals claiming that the district court abused its discretion in denying Analostan§ 3613(c). We have reviewed the partiesÂ’ briefs and the joint appendix and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Nester v. Analostan Homes AssÂ’n, Inc. , No. CA-02-88-A (E.D. Va. filed Aug. 20, 2002 & entered Aug. 21, 2002; filed Sept. 26, 2002 & entered Oct. 1, 2002). We remind Nester and his counsel that Fed. R. Civ. P. 11 requires that pleadings be filed with a good faith belief that they are not frivolous and that further failure to abide by the Rule is grounds for sanctions. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED